Conversion & UX
Conversion Optimisation Program
An ongoing CRO program with a dedicated team running tests across your site, funnel and app every month
Conversion & UX · Experimentation Programmes
ExperimentationProgramme Launch
A structured start to A/B testing: tool selection, tracking, a prioritised backlog and your first tests live within one quarter
Many operators buy a testing tool and then run a handful of unconnected tests. We set up the foundations properly: tool selection, tracking checks, a prioritisation framework such as PIE or ICE, a hypothesis template and a compliance sign-off step. By the end of the quarter your first tests are live and your team knows how to keep the programme running.
What you get
- ◆Testing tool selection and setup
- ◆Prioritisation framework and backlog
- ◆Hypothesis and test brief templates
- ◆Compliance sign-off workflow
- ◆First tests designed and launched
How it works
- 01
Add it to your offer
Combine it with any other services, markets and a budget if you have one in mind.
- 02
Get a custom quote
We reply with scope, timeline and price for your brand, usually within one business day.
- 03
Accept and kick off
Accept with one click, get your invoice and meet the team that runs it.
More in Experimentation Programmes
See allConversion & UX
VWO Implementation & Test Builds
VWO set up for iGaming sites and apps, with flicker-free tests, GA4 integration and experiments built by our developers
Conversion & UX
Optimizely Web & Feature Experimentation
Optimizely Web for front-end tests and Feature Experimentation for server-side tests in cashier, betslip and registration
Conversion & UX
AB Tasty Test Implementation
AB Tasty configured for your brands, with reusable widgets, personalisation campaigns and tests built and checked by our team
Conversion & UX
Server-Side & Feature Flag Testing
Backend experiments through feature flag platforms, for tests a browser script cannot handle, such as cashier logic and odds display
Conversion & UX
Test Statistics & Result Audits
An independent review of past and running experiments for peeking, sample ratio mismatch, underpowered tests and misread results